Amended from WirelessNet Design Line:
With the increased demand for wireless technologies, industry leaders
are looking to see how Washington policy makers will confront the
vexing problem of RF spectrum scarcity. Of late, the FCC has opted to
relieve the pressure by making additional swaths of licensed spectrum
available for commercial use, typically in the higher microwave
frequencies. The Commission's move this winter to make the 3.65- to
3.7-GHz band available for nationwide license with minimal regulatory
requirements is one such example.
In other circles, however, the tone of the debate has shifted away
from simple spectrum allocation solutions, relying more heavily on the
industry's track record of innovation. Recently, for instance,
Congress's investigative arm, the General Accounting Office or GAO,
provided a checklist for policy makers to use in attempting to free up
more spectrum and allocate its utilization optimally. Among the items
on that list are identifying technologies capable of operating at above
100 GHz; development of advanced compression algorithms that would
reduce spectrum demand; advancement of software-defined radios capable
of changing their operating parameters; and the refining of
spectrally-efficient waveforms.
Cognitive radio technology adapts its use of spectrum based on the
real-time conditions of its operating environment. In the process,
which is conceptually simple, the network identifies which users need
service, determines which are operating in the best environment, and
fixes on the most efficient data transmission scheme to satisfy the
user's request (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. The cognitive modulation process.
Deliberately and continuously applied, this process results in
significantly improved spectrum utilization and is the basis for many
of today's wireless standards. W-CDMA High Speed Downlink Packet Access
(HSDPA), 3G mobile wireless technologies, and CDMA1x EvDO all employ a
cognitive modulation process that attempts to get the highest
throughput from a limited spectrum. Mobile wireless isn't the only area
using an adaptive or cognitive modulation process, however. Wireless
LAN technology (802.11a) and fixed wireless (Flash-OFDM) employ similar
processes to improve overall spectrum utilization.
Spectrum multi-purposing The limitation of existing cognitive
radio technology is that users competing for access to throughput on
the channel can't simultaneously receive service. Spectrum
multi-purposing technologies attempt to address this quandary.
The notion of RF spectrum multi-purposing—exploiting spectrum
"gray spaces" or unused regions of dedicated spectrum—is a fairly
significant departure from the single-use allocation scheme the FCC
employs today. AM and FM radio stations, paging services, and cellular
services all use RF spectrum allocated by the FCC for one particular
use. However, if technological advances enable spectrum dedicated for
an FM radio station to simultaneously provide broadband wireless
services to a small city without degrading the FM broadcast, the
possibilities for wireless deployment would grow exponentially.
Ultra Wideband (UWB), with its low-power transmission profile,
is a step in the right direction. However, UWB's sideband emissions
aren't completely interference-free, requiring the use of higher
frequency spectrum (upwards of 3 to 10 GHz), which has limited
propagation characteristics.
The xMax solution One modulation technique could potentially
meet this challenge. Called xMax, the RF modulation scheme is a hybrid
technology combining aspects of narrowband carrier systems and
low-powered wideband pulse position modulation (PPM) that permits
simultaneous spectrum reuse.
While prior schemes tried to move as much power as possible
into the sidebands (where the information resides) and away from the
carrier signal, xMax does the opposite, placing most of the power in
the carrier to keep sideband energy emissions negligible. The xMax
modulation is characterized by an RF spectrum utilization profile where
adjacent channel spillover is so far below detectable levels that it
has no effect on neighboring users (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2. The xMAX spectrum utilization profile. |